Male Butt Waxing In Philadelphia

maintenance payments to a parent must already have a ruling against the same cause?

Your query was:

• My husband food are claiming paternity, that is, judicially declared the child's parentage, but his lawyer did not notice of hearings or when is do DNA testing. The process was handled by deceit, in fact. Does your income can be garnished if I am receiving a pension for food to be sentenced in 2001 and was 60% of your salary? Could it be that the company may be granted authority to disregard the prior ruling in my favor? Because my husband has informed me that in two weeks you have paid only 100 soles and how it could be argued that money for 15 days?

Thank you for your confidence to write.
In answer to your question, there are several aspects, I'll explain one by one:
1. What has suceidido with her husband is not the result of a process of "affiliation" which aims to achieve a judicial declaration of paternity in this case in favor of the child for whom we dealt.
2. If this trial did not allow the defense of her husband, as you call or braudulenta so there is a way to seek its annulment, through a process called "fraudulent res judicata."
3. Another issue is the food that you come to receive the discount through her husband is in the company where she works.
4. On this second issue, the company can not revoke the pension of food already is complying. The company only and must comply with the injunction.
5. What you should do is ask her husband either of the two judges, the process of food, or judge of the second process, ie, the child whose parentage is judicially declared, that the pension is reduced proportionally to both injunctions, so that he does not charged more than 60% of what you earn, which is the maximum allowed by law.
Regards,